Stupid Question ™
By John Ruch
© 2004
Q: Was anyone ever
burned at the stake in
—An Internet Pagan,
from the Internet
A: Yes, indeed,
My dear pagan, you are undoubtedly thinking of Colonial witch-burnings. Fortunately, there weren’t any. Hanging was the Colonial death penalty of choice, and even then, in close-knit communities, it was rarely used. A murderer was more likely to be mutilated a bit and then made to stand on the gallows for a while to think about it, or wear a noose around their neck for a few years.
Various Native American tribes weren’t above tying the occasional scoundrel up and burning him, if you want to count the first “Americans.”
But as for the Colonials and their descendants, burning at the stake has been reserved almost exclusively for black men, and certainly for minorities.
The Colonials hopped on the burn-at-the-stake bandwagon in the 1700s, where it was put on the books in the Northern Colonies apparently as a sort of eye-for-an-eye punishment for arson. Arson by slaves, anyway.
Like most draconian Colonial laws, it was probably put on the books mostly to scare the socks off of people, which was much more effective in small Colonial towns than in today’s anonymous, mobile society.
However,
that’s not to say it wasn’t put into force. There are two recorded cases of
slaves being put to the torch as punishment for arson in
Then there
was the infamous
Records are too incomplete to know who was literally the last person to be judicially executed at the stake, but it almost certainly happened in this 1700s period. In the 1800s, sentiments grew against “brutal” forms of execution, which slowly led to the cessation of public execution, use of “merciful” methods such as the (now-considered-barbaric) electric chair and lethal injection, and so on.
But extra-judicial burnings at the stake were just warming up. The horrible reign of lynch mobs from the mid-1800s to the early 1900s led to thousands of deaths at the hands of kangaroo courts and bloodthirsty crowds for victims of all types.
However, the vast majority of lynching victims were black men killed by racist mobs. And minorities were the only ones to be burned at the stake, either literally or as close to it as convenience permitted. A crime, real or imagined, committed on a white woman was typically the excuse.
This legacy of burnings is bizarre and hideous almost beyond belief—all the moreso if you accept the commonplace notion that racism has gradually waned in the country. In fact, publicly acceptable racism—and burnings—peaked around 1900-1910.
I include lynching as an “execution” because such acts of vigilantism were intended as a sort of ersatz law and often reflected community mores—hideous as they might be—more accurately than actual law and order.
The classic
rebirth of American stake burnings was the tragedy of Sam Holt or Hose. Accused
of murdering a white man and raping his wife, Holt/Hose was tied to a “small
sapling” surrounded by wood near
During his
1904 campaign,
Blacks
weren’t the only victims. Hispanic Antonio Rodriguez was, incredibly, burned at
the cactus in
But
African-Americans certainly bore the brunt of this grotesque pyromania. After
being legally sentenced to death (by hanging) for the rape/murder of a white
woman, Jesse Washington of
In
James Irwin
of
On
Such crimes
have faded as lynch mobs have become socially unacceptable. But, obviously, the
fiery pathology remains in more personal crimes of hatred, such as the 2002
homophobic murder-by-gasoline of