Stupid Question ™
By John Ruch
© 2003
Q: Why do ducks get
such a bad rap—dead duck, lame duck, etc.?
—Matt
A: Hey, it’s not being a duck that’s bad—it’s being dead or lame that sucks.
But I must confess that “duck” does carry a lot of other negative connotations. Being called any sort of animal is, in general, not good.
Still,
there was a golden era in
Within 50
years,
But then there’s also “duck” meaning a ship or plane so screwed up it won’t move, and “duck” meaning a zero score in a cricket game (an allusion to the round shape of a duck’s egg, much as we say “goose egg” in the US).
My dictionary tells me “duck” also once meant “a British solider of the Bombay Presidency.” What does this mean? I don’t know, except that much of Britian is as crazy as Tony Blair’s wife.
“Dead duck” showed up in the 1830s, before all this vicious nonsense, and originally meant something closer to what “lame duck” means today—someone out of date or powerless. It came from political slang. The first know written use of it refers it back to a supposed pre-existing phrase: “Never waste powder on a dead duck.”
The modern meaning of someone doomed dates to the World War II era.
“Lame duck” is much older, from the mid-1700s, when it was originally business slang for someone who went bankrupt playing the stock market. Nobody really knows why, but something waddling and flapping about in pain seems like a pretty congruous image. Those old British stock market dudes had an obsession with animal terms—“lame duck” often showed up with the “bull” and “bear” expressions we still use today.
“Lame duck”
eventually became a generic term for a deadbeat and became popular in
Meanwhile,
back in
Duckness certainly isn’t all bad. It often refers to
ease—“like a duck to water”—and is still a term of endearment (“ducky”).
There’s also “duck soup,” meaning something extremely easy or sure to
succeed—though even that eventually developed the meaning of someone who was an
easy mark for a con.